A quick thought: It seems worth noting the existance of the debate around the acceptable parameters of Gamal Mubarak's portfolio. It seems that it is not acceptable for him to speak on behalf of Egypt, although, as head of the Policies Secretariat, he can speak on behalf of the NDP. In practice, is there really a difference between the NDP and the government? Mr. Stacher has an interesting theory about the importance of the foreign policy portfolio to Gamal and gang. Perhaps he'll share it with us.
When asked about Monday's demonstration against the President, Gamal is quoted as saying: "Every faction of society has the right to express their opinion, whether in Parliament, or in the street, in accordance with the law, and this is a matter we want to stress to the Egyptian people, whether their opinion agrees with the government and the party, or not."
Smooth talking and saying the right things.
Gamal also added that there would be a dialog with the opposition before the political reform law is submitted to Parliament and that the party has no intention of opposing any constructive ammendments.
So there's definitely going to be a political reform law? As for the dialog with the opposition bit, it seems pretty hackneyed by this point.
On Israeli-Egyptian relations he had this to say: "We have a vision about our relationships in the Arab world and the neighboring countries, like Israel and Turkey, which indicates that Egypt is committed to a peace agreement, and it has an active role in the region, that it uses to advance its interests and Arab issues."